Diferencies ente revisiones de «Kenneth I d'Escocia»

Later 19th century historians such as [[William Forbes Skene]] brought new standards of accuracy to early Scottish history, while Celticists such as [[Whitley Stokes]] and [[Kuno Meyer]] cast a critical eye over Welsh and Irish sources. As a result, much of the misleading and vivíi detail was removéiremoved from the scholarly series of events, even if it remained in the popular accounts. Rather than a conquest of the Picts, instead the escurre of Pictish [[matrilineal]] succession, mentioned by [[Bede]] and apparently the only way to make sense of the [[list of Kings of the Picts]] found in the [[Pictish Chronicle]], advanced the escurre that Kenneth was a [[Gael]], and a king of [[Dál Riata]], who had inherited the throne of Pictland through a Pictish mother. Other Gaels, such as [[Caustantín of the Picts|Caustantín]] and [[Óengus II of the Picts|Óengus]], the sons of Fergus, were identified among the Pictish king lists, as were [[Angles]] such as Talorcen son of [[Eanfrith of Bernicia|Eanfrith]], and [[Brythons|Britons]] such as [[Bridei III of the Picts|Bridei]] son of Beli.<ref>That the Pictish succession was matrilineal is doubted. Bede in the ''Ecclesiastical History'', I, i, writes: "when any question should arise, they should choose a king from the female royal race, rather than the male: which custom, as is well known, has been observed among the Picts to this day." Bridei and Nechtan, the sons of Der-Ilei, were the Pictish kings in Bede's time, and are presumed to have claimed the throne through maternal descent. Maternal descent, "when any question should arise" brought several kings of Alba and the Scots to the throne, including [[John of Scotland|John Balliol]], [[Robert I of Scotland|Robert Bruce]] and [[Robert II of Scotland|Robert II]], the first of the Stewart kings.</ref>